Home
About
Contact
Links
IDEA
Fuel
Polls |
Last updated
Thursday 17 June 2004 08:39 PM |
Poll Results
P.S. IDEA, in conjunction with
Our Children
Left Behind, conducted polls relating to the IDEA
reauthorization from August 7, 2003 through August 30, 2003. The
results are given below.*Thank you
for your participation! |
|
Before disciplinary action can be taken, IDEA
mandates that a school determine whether a special education student's
behavior was a result (manifestation) of his/her disability.
|
|
|
Answers |
Votes |
Percent |
|
1. |
|
One system of discipline should apply
to ALL students, regardless of disability. |
22 |
3% |
|
2. |
|
It is unfair to punish a student for
behaviors that are a manifestation of his/her disability.
|
624 |
97% |
|
|
Total Votes: 646
|
|
|
Proposed IDEA legislation allows states to cap the
attorney fees that prevailing parent/student attorneys can be
reimbursed. |
|
|
Answers |
Votes |
Percent |
|
1. |
|
This is a bad idea because attorneys
are not bound to ACCEPT those caps. Thus, the prevailing party could
still be required to make up the difference. |
126 |
20% |
|
2. |
|
This is a good idea ONLY if the
schools are similarly limited in the amount they can pay THEIR
attorneys. |
26 |
4% |
|
3. |
|
Both of the above. |
444 |
71% |
|
4. |
|
None of the above. |
27 |
4% |
|
|
Total Votes: 623
|
|
|
Originally, the federal government promised to fund
40% of the cost of special education. The most that the federal
government has ever provided to the states is 11 percent. |
|
|
Answers |
Votes |
Percent |
|
1. |
|
With 40% funding, it is more likely
that IDEA would be implemented. |
135 |
21% |
|
2. |
|
It isn't funding, but attitude, that
determines whether IDEA is implemented. |
514 |
79% |
|
|
Total Votes: 649
|
|
|
Proposed IDEA legislation mandates a "preliminary
meeting" before a due process hearing can be held. If an agreement is
reached during a preliminary meeting, it would be "enforceable in any
State court ... or in a district court of the United States."
|
|
|
Answers |
Votes |
Percent |
|
1. |
|
This would decrease the number of due
process hearings by resolving disputes at a lower level.
|
95 |
14% |
|
2. |
|
This would not change the number of
due process hearings. |
568 |
86% |
|
|
Total Votes: 663
|
|
|
Proposed IDEA legislation would discontinue the use
of short-term objectives (benchmarks) on the IEP, relying instead only
on annual goals to assess progress. |
|
|
Answers |
Votes |
Percent |
|
1. |
|
Benchmarks are necessary to ensure
meaningful progress for students with disabilities. They also ensure
accountability. |
644 |
97% |
|
2. |
|
Benchmarks are not necessary to ensure
meaningful progress for students with disabilities. Annual goals are
sufficient, and any additional requirements generate unnecessary
paperwork. |
23 |
3% |
|
|
Total Votes: 667
|
|
|
Proposed IDEA legislation requires states to merely
provide OSEP with "assurances" that they'll meet all conditions for
eligibility (such as provision of FAPE) rather that actually
demonstrating to OSEP's satisfaction that the conditions are met.
|
|
|
Answers |
Votes |
Percent |
|
1. |
|
Providing assurances to OSEP is
sufficient to ensure that state eligibility criteria will be met.
|
14 |
2% |
|
2. |
|
States need to be held more
accountable to OSEP, not less. |
676 |
98% |
|
|
Total Votes: 690
|
|
|
Proposed IDEA legislation creates a "risk pool" for
high-need children requiring services costing 4 times more than the
average per-pupil expenditure. These risk pool funds should ...
|
|
|
Answers |
Votes |
Percent |
|
1. |
|
Follow the eligible child to any
educational environment, regardless if parentally-placed.
|
587 |
96% |
|
2. |
|
Only be available if the student
accepts the district's placement. |
27 |
4% |
|
|
Total Votes: 614
|
|
|
Proposed IDEA legislation would allow up to 15% of
IDEA funds to be used for pre-referral services. |
|
|
Answers |
Votes |
Percent |
|
1. |
|
This is a good idea. Students' needs
will be met without all the red tape & stigma associated with
special education. A referral can be made at any time, should more
formal services be required. |
45 |
6% |
|
2. |
|
This is a bad idea. Students receiving
these pre-referral services would have none of IDEAs procedural
safeguards. It is unlikely that the parent/student would even be
aware that IDEA funds were being used since there is no IEP and no
placement. |
654 |
94% |
|
|
Total Votes: 699
|
|
|
Proposed IDEA legislation calls for statistical
reporting on the numbers of mediations and due process hearings, along
with their outcomes. The data collected, however, is not further
applied. |
|
|
Answers |
Votes |
Percent |
|
1. |
|
The reports should be used to reward
districts showing improvements in resolving disputes at the lowest
levels. |
57 |
4% |
|
2. |
|
The reports should be used to penalize
districts that have consistently high percentages of disputes
culminating in due process hearings. |
9 |
1% |
|
3. |
|
Both of the above. |
1516 |
95% |
|
4. |
|
None of the above. |
18 |
1% |
|
|
Total Votes: 1600
|
|
|
* NOTE: These
polls were conducted using BraveNet's service, which allows visitors to vote
only once per poll per IP address per day. The polls were set to rotate
through the 9 questions at random. Poll questions were drafted by a panel
of parent volunteers, and every attempt was made to ensure that the
questions were balanced. That being said, we are not professional pollsters
or statisticians. We are just parents trying to give our legislators what
they've asked for -- DATA. Please feel free to copy, use, and/or distribute
the poll results as you continue to advocate for a better IDEA. As a
courtesy to those receiving your letters, please cite your source as
"Parents Supporting IDEA at www.psIDEA.org"
Thank you. |